Tuesday, February 21, 2023

MARIA TERESA B. TANI-DE LA FUENTE vs. RODOLFO DE LA FUENTE, JR. G.R. No. 188400 March 8, 2017

Petitioner Maria Teresa and respondent Rodolfo got married and got two children: Katharyn and Kimberly. Prior to their marriage, petitioner already noticed that respondent was an introvert and was prone to jealousy. She also observed that Rodolfo appeared to have no ambition in life and felt insecure of his siblings, who excelled in their studies and careers. Rodolfo's attitude worsened as they went on with their marital life and even treated Maria Teresa like a sex slave. Petitioner suggested that she and Rodolfo undergo marriage counselling, but Rodolfo refused and deemed it as mere "kalokohan".

 

Sometime in 1986, the couple quarreled because Rodolfo suspected that Maria Teresa was having an affair. In the heat of their quarrel, Rodolfo poked a gun at Maria Teresa's head. Maria Teresa, with their two (2) daughters in tow, left Rodolfo and their conjugal home after the gunpoking incident. Maria Teresa never saw Rodolfo again after that, and she supported their children by herself. Maria Teresa then filed a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage before the RTC.

 

Dr. Lopez, a clinical psychologist, was presented as an expert witness and diagnosed Rodolfo with "paranoid personality disorder”. He claimed that Rodolfo’s condition was serious and incurable because of his severe paranoia. He then recommended that Maria Teresa and Rodolfo's marriage be annulled due to Rodolfo's incapacity to perform his marital obligations.

 

Q: If you were the judge, will you grant the Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage for reason of Rodolfo’s psychological incapacity?

 

A: Yes, if I were the judge, I will grant the Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage.

 

The law provides standards for determining psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code wherein "psychological incapacity must be characterized by (a) gravity, (b) juridical antecedence, and (c) incurability." Furthermore, the incapacity "should refer to no less than a mental (not physical) incapacity that causes a party to be truly incognitive of the basic marital covenants that concomitantly must be assumed and discharged by the parties to the marriage.”


In this case, an expert opinion on the psychological and mental disposition of the parties must be given with credence.  Dr. Lopez, in his explanations, had elaborated the presence of elements to prove the psychological incapacity of Rodolfo as to the gravity, juridical antecedence and incurability of his paranoid personality disorder. Dr. Lopez explained that respondent's psychological incapacity to perform his marital obligations was likely caused by growing up with a pathogenic parental model.


Respondent's repeated behavior of psychological abuses to his wife are proof of his depravity, and utter lack of comprehension of what marriage and partnership entail. Since the State's interest must be toward the stability of society, the notion of psychological incapacity should not only be based on a medical or psychological disorder, but should consist of the inability to comply with essential marital obligations such that public interest is imperiled. Therefore, marriage between Maria Theresa and Rodolfo must be declared null and void for reason of psychological incapacity of Rodolfo.